Dear Yana,
I’ve
been on an out-of-town trip recently and I noticed a curious thing – whenever I
recall all the different places I went to, there’s always a certain color
formed in my head that is associated to one scene. When I recalled the time I
went to the beach, I see the color blue; that time when I went hiking in the
mountain, I see green; when I went back to the city, I always remember it having a gray hue. I understand that these different scenes have their own
characteristic color that may be due to the different elements and objects
found in them. What I am interested in is how my memory for these scenes seem
to be associated with every day images, giving each color a “character”. When I
see gray objects, I think of the hussle and bustle of city life; when I see
green objects, it reminds me of taking that hiking trip; when I see blue, I am
reminded of the cool and fresh breeze on the beach.
How does this happen?
Senserely yours,
Paris Hilton
Dear Paris Hilton,
Thank you so much for writing and supporting
our online blog! In order to address your question, it is first important to
explain how color contributes to memory, particularly memory on the information
in a natural scene.
In a study done by Wichmann, Sharpe, & Gegenfurtner (2002), identified several factors that contribute to recognition memory for color images. They have found that surface property color does play an important role in recognition memory for natural scenes. Some of the factors they have identified are
1) Color Information facilitates
storage in memory (cognitive facilitation)
-
At least for complex natural
images, surface property color is stored in memory
-
There is an interaction between
conceptual prior knowledge about scenes and the benefit color has to memory
retention
-
Sensory information (surface
color) and conceptual knowledge must not be in conflict for the benefit to
occur, as evidenced by the fact that the recognition memory advantage
disappears for falsely colored images of natural scenes (dependent on the color
congruence of presented images with learned knowledge about the color pattern
of a scene)
-
There exists two memory
components explaining the effects of color on human memory: 1) achromatic
object system based on the structure of the scene, and 2) surface-based
episodic memory system storing color information
2) Color Increases Attention
3) Color helps in improving
segmentation (sensory facilitation)
-
One example of how color
facilitates scene segmentation and thus, recognition, is seen in how for
landscapes and rock formations, the color information appears superficially and
rather redundant. Whereas it appears highly important for flower images. One
can say that the surface property of color is much richer for flowers than for
rock formations). Nevertheless, all objects can benefit from the chromatic
information
-
The study shows that the
extraction of chromatic information must be very fast and that color is being
processed faster than most other features. This presents a conflict with
results from past research where processing of color is seen to be slower in
the visual cortex (Munk, Nowak, Girard, Chounlamountri, & Bullier, 1995 as cited in
Wichmann, Sharpe, & Gegenfurter, 2002).
-
Color recognition memory for
images of natural scenes are superior to that for black-and-white images if the
same scenes for presentation times as short as 16 ms (Gegenfurter & Rieger,
2000 as cited in Wichmann, Sharpe, & Gegenfurter, 2002).
Thus, we can see that color does facilitate
memory. This may help explain the fact that when you recall scenes in your
mind, there is always that characteristic color that is associated with a scene
(e.g. blue – beach, green – mountain, gray – city). To further describe how
color facilitates recognition of a scene, we now focus on how memory can help
in the recognition of scene gist and of scenes in general. The gist of the
scene or scene gist refers to a general description of a type of scene
(Goldstein, 2010).
A
study done by Castelhano & Henderson (2008) has shown that color has an
influence across a wide variety of scenes and is directly associated with scene
gist. Their study shows that removal of color information from normal scenes
produced no effect on the activation of a scene gist; however, when structural
information was degraded (i.e. the scene was blurred), color had an effect on
the activation of a scene gist. We can see that color produced a more
pronounced bias effect in blurred scenes. These results suggest that color
plays a role in the activation of scene gist but that it is dependent on the
quality of structural information (Castlhano & Henderson, 2008). This also
supports the finding from Wichmann, Sharpe, & Gegenfurter (2002) study that
there are two memory components to the effect of color on memory: structural
information and color information.
The ability of color to produce a more
pronounced bias effect in blurred scenes shows that it may have acted as a
segmenter of scene regions or a direct cue for scene gist (Castelhano &
Henderson, 2008). These two functions of color represents two hypothesis
respectively – the segmentation hypothesis (color contributes only when the structure
is degraded as it helps recover some of the boundary edges that are lost in
blurred images; implies that only structure can directly activate scene gist)
and the color association hypothesis (color itself is associated with scene
gist and can act as a direct cue). Castelhano & Henderson (2008) imply,
however, that both the structure and color associated with scene gist can
contribute directly to activation.

We have already emphasized that structure
information and color information interact for the recognition and memory of
scenes. Studies (Wichmann, Sharpe, & Gegenfurtner, 2002; Castelhano &
Henderson, 2008) also show the contribution of a third factor – conceptual knowledge.
Memory for the details of a briefly presented scene is often “based on the
scene’s associated semantic
category and is affected by its associated schemas, not the actual details
present in the scene” (Brewer & Treyens, 1981; Hollingworth & Henderson, 1999; Intraub, 1981 as cited in Castelhano & Henderson, 2008).
Thus, Paris Hilton, your memory of scenes and
the color you associate with these scenes, as well as how you are able to
associate various objects to these scenes, is dependent on the interplay of
three factors – structure of the scene, color information, and your conceptual
prior knowledge of the scene. As with any other perceptual process, you can see
that there is a combination of both bottom-up and top-down processes.
I hope that I was able to answer your
questions. Cheers to all your future travels!
Senserely yours,
Yana
References
Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 34(3), 660-675. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660
Goldstein, E.B. (2010). Sensation and Perception [Eighth edition]. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Wichmann, F.A., Sharpe, L.T., & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2002). The contributions of color to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, And Cognition, 28(3), 509-520. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.509
References
Castelhano, M.S., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 34(3), 660-675. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.660
Goldstein, E.B. (2010). Sensation and Perception [Eighth edition]. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Wichmann, F.A., Sharpe, L.T., & Gegenfurtner, K.R. (2002). The contributions of color to recognition memory for natural scenes. Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, And Cognition, 28(3), 509-520. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.509
No comments:
Post a Comment